Tesla K80m vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking220not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.33no data
Power efficiency6.89no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK110BGK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 November 2013 (11 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28802x 2496
Core clock speed875 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate222.72x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482x 48
TMUs2402x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 November 2013 17 November 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has 20% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 649 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.