Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Place in the ranking	221	467
Place by popularity	not in top-100	87
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.34	no data
Power efficiency	6.78	23.19
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GK110B	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 November 2013 (11 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	96
Core clock speed	875 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	928 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	222.7	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.345 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	240	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	no data
Memory bus width	384 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	no data
Memory bandwidth	336 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	no data
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
3D Vision	+	-
3D Vision Live	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 Ti 24.72
+161%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 780 Ti 15619
+140%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 780 Ti 38813
+49.4%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780 Ti 11812
+130%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 780 Ti 75688
+181%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 +281%	26 −281%
1440p	35−40 +133%	15 −133%
4K	27−30 +145%	11 −145%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	7.06	no data
1440p	19.97	no data
4K	25.89	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+100%

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +145%	22 −145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +100%	21 −100%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +179%	27−30 −179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +38.9%	36 −38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +150%	16 −150%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +159%	21−24 −159%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +146%	24−27 −146%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +129%	60−65 −129%
Hitman 3	50−55 +108%	24 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −8.8%	124 +8.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +143%	35 −143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +276%	17 −276%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +168%	30−35 −168%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +13.3%	90 −13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +135%	21−24 −135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +133%	18 −133%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +179%	27−30 −179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +56.3%	32 −56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +208%	13 −208%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +159%	21−24 −159%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +146%	24−27 −146%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +129%	60−65 −129%
Hitman 3	50−55 +117%	23 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +1.8%	112 −1.8%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +204%	28 −204%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +146%	26 −146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +177%	30 −177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +104%	24−27 −104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +21.4%	84 −21.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +286%	14 −286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +200%	14−16 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +117%	23 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +264%	11 −264%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +159%	21−24 −159%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +129%	60−65 −129%
Hitman 3	50−55 +150%	20 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +396%	23 −396%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +246%	24 −246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +279%	14 −279%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +67.2%	60−65 −67.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+357%

−357%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +161%	18−20 −161%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +171%	14−16 −171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +129%	7 −129%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +155%	10−12 −155%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +244%	40−45 −244%
Hitman 3	27−30 +123%	12−14 −123%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +155%	20−22 −155%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +262%	12−14 −262%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +184%	19 −184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +133%	60−65 −133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+156%

16−18

−156%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Hitman 3	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +226%	35−40 −226%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +125%	12 −125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +173%	11 −173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+133%

9−10

−133%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

GTX 780 Ti is 281% faster in 1080p
GTX 780 Ti is 133% faster in 1440p
GTX 780 Ti is 145% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 780 Ti is 500% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 9% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 780 Ti is ahead in 71 test (99%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.72	9.47
Recency	7 November 2013	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	28 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has a 161% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 792.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.