GeForce FX 5900 Ultra vs GTX 780 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	218	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.27	no data
Power efficiency	6.84	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code name	GK110B	NV35
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 November 2013 (11 years ago)	23 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	no data
Core clock speed	875 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	928 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,080 million	135 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	59 Watt
Texture fill rate	222.7	3.600
Floating-point processing power	5.345 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	240	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	267 mm	218 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x Molex
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	425 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336 GB/s	27.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
3D Vision	+	-
3D Vision Live	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	9.0a
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	1.5 (2.1)
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 November 2013	23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	59 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---