Xbox One S GPU vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.29no data
Power efficiency3.00no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BDurango 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)2 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed863 MHz914 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate173.243.87
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS1.404 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs19248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2013 2 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 95 Watt

Xbox One S GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 163.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Xbox One S GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Xbox One S GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 174 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.