Radeon HD 8650M vs GeForce GTX 775M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 775M and Radeon HD 8650M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 775M outperforms HD 8650M by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 465 | 874 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 6.52 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN (2012−2015) |
GPU code name | N13E-GTX-A2 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 7 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 650 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3540 Million | 900 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Shared memory | - | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 11.1 |
CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+229%
|
7−8
−229%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+800%
|
7−8
−800%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+206%
|
16−18
−206%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+383%
|
6−7
−383%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+244%
|
9−10
−244%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+74.3%
|
35−40
−74.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+229%
|
7−8
−229%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+800%
|
7−8
−800%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+206%
|
16−18
−206%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+383%
|
6−7
−383%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+244%
|
9−10
−244%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+74.3%
|
35−40
−74.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+229%
|
7−8
−229%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+800%
|
7−8
−800%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+206%
|
16−18
−206%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+244%
|
9−10
−244%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+74.3%
|
35−40
−74.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+550%
|
4−5
−550%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+500%
|
3−4
−500%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+413%
|
8−9
−413%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+85.7%
|
7−8
−85.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
+500%
|
10−11
−500%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+220%
|
5−6
−220%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
+388%
|
8−9
−388%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 775M is 2800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 775M surpassed HD 8650M in all 53 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.42 | 2.04 |
Recency | 24 September 2013 | 7 January 2013 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
GTX 775M has a 361.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.