GeForce GT 525M vs GTX 775M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M and GeForce GT 525M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.42
+692%

GTX 775M outperforms GT 525M by a whopping 692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4651052
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.523.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2GF108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)5 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134496
Core clock speed719 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1824 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 API
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.42
+692%
GT 525M 1.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
+692%
GT 525M 459

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071
+660%
GT 525M 799

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 775M 11865
+537%
GT 525M 1864

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 775M 36
+500%
GT 525M 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+669%
13
−669%
Full HD150−160
+689%
19
−689%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Hitman 3 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Hitman 3 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Hitman 3 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+90.6%
30−35
−90.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+1100%
5−6
−1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how GTX 775M and GT 525M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M is 669% faster in 900p
  • GTX 775M is 689% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 775M is 6200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 775M surpassed GT 525M in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.42 1.19
Recency 24 September 2013 5 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 775M has a 691.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 525M, on the other hand, has 334.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 525M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GeForce GT 525M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 345 votes

Rate GeForce GT 525M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.