GeForce GT 330M vs GTX 775M

Place in the ranking	469	1212
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.57	1.70
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	GT216
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	48
Core clock speed	719 MHz	625 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	10.00
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.06528 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	182
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	no data	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Power management	no data	8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	no data	4.1
OpenGL	no data	2.1
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.42
+1582%

GT 330M 0.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634
+1582%

GT 330M 216

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	160−170 +1500%	10 −1500%
Full HD	280−290 +1547%	17 −1547%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+400%

3−4

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Battlefield 5	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +2000%	3−4 −2000%
Hitman 3	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +373%	10−12 −373%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Battlefield 5	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +2000%	3−4 −2000%
Hitman 3	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +373%	10−12 −373%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +2800%	1−2 −2800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +2000%	3−4 −2000%
Hitman 3	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +373%	10−12 −373%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+2500%

1−2

−2500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +1950%	2−3 −1950%
Hitman 3	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +5900%	1−2 −5900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+433%

3−4

−433%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +1850%	2−3 −1850%
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

This is how GTX 775M and GT 330M compete in popular games:

GTX 775M is 1500% faster in 900p
GTX 775M is 1547% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 775M is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 775M surpassed GT 330M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.42	0.56
Recency	24 September 2013	10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	23 Watt

GTX 775M has a 1582.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 330M, on the other hand, has 334.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.