Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking535not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.18no data
Power efficiency6.96no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9603584
Core clock speed811 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate63.76224.0
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs80224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB16 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 230 Watt

GTX 770M has 206.7% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 770M and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M is a notebook card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.