Radeon HD 6540G2 vs GeForce GTX 770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M and Radeon HD 6540G2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.24
+448%

GTX 770M outperforms HD 6540G2 by a whopping 448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5411028
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.47no data
Power efficiency6.62no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK106no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960480
Core clock speed811 MHzno data
Boost clock speed797 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate63.76no data
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.24
+448%
HD 6540G2 1.32

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M 4889
+395%
HD 6540G2 987

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 770M 19208
+483%
HD 6540G2 3295

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
+513%
8−9
−513%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Hitman 3 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

This is how GTX 770M and HD 6540G2 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770M is 513% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 770M is 2300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 770M surpassed HD 6540G2 in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.24 1.32
Recency 30 May 2013 14 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GTX 770M has a 448.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6540G2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
Radeon HD 6540G2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 127 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6540G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.