Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.24

T1000 outperforms GTX 770M by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.47no data
Power efficiency6.6223.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK106TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed811 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate63.76no data
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.24
Quadro T1000 16.79
+132%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2791
Quadro T1000 6469
+132%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 770M 8652
Quadro T1000 33875
+292%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 770M 6572
Quadro T1000 34236
+421%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−124%
110−120
+124%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Hitman 3 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−121%
95−100
+121%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Hitman 3 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−121%
95−100
+121%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−129%
110−120
+129%
Hitman 3 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−121%
95−100
+121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−122%
120−130
+122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Hitman 3 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−117%
100−105
+117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Hitman 3 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−129%
55−60
+129%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

This is how GTX 770M and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 124% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.24 16.79
Recency 30 May 2013 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro T1000 has a 131.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 127 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 407 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.