GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 770M

Place in the ranking	537	952
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.27	0.04
Power efficiency	6.74	5.98
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	GK106	GK208
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.99	$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M has 10575% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	960	192
Core clock speed	811 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,540 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	63.76	15.26
Floating-point processing power	1.53 TFLOPS	0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	8
TMUs	80	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	2.713" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	-	+
HDCP content protection	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
3D Vision	-	+
PureVideo	-	+
PhysX	-	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.25
+345%

GT 710 1.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2797
+346%

GT 710 627

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 770M 3347
+253%

GT 710 947

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 770M 23513
+223%

GT 710 7270

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 770M 8654
+344%

GT 710 1947

GeekBench 5 CUDA

GTX 770M 6572
+333%

GT 710 1519

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 770M 24
+300%

GT 710 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	49 +513%	8 −513%
1440p	16−18 +300%	4 −300%
4K	30−35 +329%	7 −329%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.88	4.37
1440p	11.87	8.75
4K	6.33	5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14
+200%

4−5

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +860%	5−6 −860%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +58.8%	30−35 −58.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +860%	5−6 −860%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +380%	5 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +58.8%	30−35 −58.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +860%	5−6 −860%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +380%	5 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +633%	3 −633%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +58.8%	30−35 −58.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+567%

3−4

−567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +420%	5−6 −420%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +475%	8−9 −475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+200%

4−5

−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	3−4	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −150%	5 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+133%

3−4

−133%

This is how GTX 770M and GT 710 compete in popular games:

GTX 770M is 513% faster in 1080p
GTX 770M is 300% faster in 1440p
GTX 770M is 329% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 770M is 860% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 710 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games: