GeForce 8800 GT vs GTX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M with GeForce 8800 GT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.25
+485%

GTX 770M outperforms 8800 GT by a whopping 485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5341034
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.200.02
Power efficiency6.690.69
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK106G92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)29 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M has 20900% better value for money than 8800 GT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960112
Core clock speed811 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt105 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate63.7633.60
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs8056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno dataSingle Slot
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options+2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit
Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.25
+485%
8800 GT 1.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2797
+485%
8800 GT 478

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
+500%
8−9
−500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.9643.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Hitman 3 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Hitman 3 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Hitman 3 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Hitman 3 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

This is how GTX 770M and 8800 GT compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770M is 500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.25 1.24
Recency 30 May 2013 29 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 105 Watt

GTX 770M has a 484.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 770M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M is a notebook card while GeForce 8800 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8800 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 599 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.