Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	378	660
Place by popularity	not in top-100	39
Power efficiency	6.25	20.60
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code name	no data	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	512
Core clock speed	811 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	57.60
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 13.68
+203%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.51

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569
+169%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 +178%	18 −178%
4K	24−27 +200%	8 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+144%

−144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +120%	15 −120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +130%	10 −130%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +161%	18 −161%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +190%	10 −190%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +144%	9 −144%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +88.9%	18 −88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +122%	18 −122%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +62.1%	58 −62.1%
Hitman 3	27−30 +200%	9 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +147%	30−33 −147%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +123%	22 −123%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +150%	16 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +147%	19 −147%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +16.9%	65 −16.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +10%	30 −10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +327%	10−12 −327%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +190%	10 −190%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +267%	6 −267%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +240%	10 −240%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +208%	13 −208%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +80.8%	52 −80.8%
Hitman 3	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +147%	30−33 −147%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +188%	17 −188%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +300%	10 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +194%	16 −194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +12.9%	31 −12.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +38.2%	55 −38.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +313%	8 −313%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +314%	7 −314%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +340%	5 −340%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +386%	7 −386%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +309%	23 −309%
Hitman 3	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +393%	15 −393%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +236%	14 −236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +338%	8 −338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +68.9%	45−50 −68.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+300%

−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +214%	7−8 −214%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +825%	8−9 −825%
Hitman 3	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +213%	8−9 −213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +218%	27−30 −218%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+200%

8−9

−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +2267%	3−4 −2267%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +100%	4 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +111%	9 −111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+160%

5−6

−160%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is 178% faster in 1080p
GTX 770M SLI is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 770M SLI surpassed RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.68	4.51
Recency	30 May 2013	26 October 2017
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has a 203.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.