FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 765M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M with FirePro M4150, including specs and performance data.

GTX 765M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.16
+110%

GTX 765M outperforms FirePro M4150 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking618835
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameN14-GEOpal
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)16 October 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed850 MHz715 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.2317.16
Floating-point performance1.326 gflops0.5491 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.16
+110%
FirePro M4150 2.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 765M 1990
+110%
FirePro M4150 948

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 765M 7122
+109%
FirePro M4150 3412

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 765M 6714
+0.4%
FirePro M4150 6685

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p51
+113%
24−27
−113%
Full HD42
+133%
18−21
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+124%
21−24
−124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Hitman 3 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how GTX 765M and FirePro M4150 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is 113% faster in 900p
  • GTX 765M is 133% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 2.46
Recency 30 May 2013 16 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB

GTX 765M has a 109.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M4150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The GeForce GTX 765M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
AMD FirePro M4150
FirePro M4150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 69 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 16 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.