Radeon Instinct MI250X vs GeForce GTX 760A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking742not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGK106Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)8 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76814080
Core clock speed628 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate42.051,496
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs64880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 500 Watt

GTX 760A has 809.1% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.