Radeon HD 7610M vs GeForce GTX 760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 with Radeon HD 7610M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.44
+659%

GTX 760 outperforms HD 7610M by a whopping 659% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking399952
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.51no data
Power efficiency5.025.62
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Whistler
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)7 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152400
Core clock speed980 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt20 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate99.079.000
Floating-point processing power2.378 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs9620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.44
+659%
HD 7610M 1.64

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760 4794
+659%
HD 7610M 632

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 760 7962
+963%
HD 7610M 749

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 760 29073
+688%
HD 7610M 3691

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 760 5959
+885%
HD 7610M 605

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 760 40150
+666%
HD 7610M 5242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+423%
13
−423%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.66no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1540%
5−6
−1540%
Hitman 3 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+109%
30−35
−109%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1540%
5−6
−1540%
Hitman 3 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+109%
30−35
−109%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1540%
5−6
−1540%
Hitman 3 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+109%
30−35
−109%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Hitman 3 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+875%
8−9
−875%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Hitman 3 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

This is how GTX 760 and HD 7610M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 423% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 760 is 1540% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 760 surpassed HD 7610M in all 51 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.44 1.64
Recency 25 June 2013 7 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 760 has a 658.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7610M, on the other hand, has 750% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 760 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7610M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon HD 7610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.