GeForce GT 240 vs GTX 760 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.32
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK104GT215
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 November 2016 (8 years ago)17 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134496
Core clock speed993 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1046 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt69 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105C C
Texture fill rate117.217.60
Floating-point processing power2.812 TFLOPS0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs11232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB or 1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s54.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortDVIVGAHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1N/A
CUDA3.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2016 17 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB or 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 69 Watt

GTX 760 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240, on the other hand, has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 146.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM and GeForce GT 240. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 893 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.