Tesla K40m vs GeForce GTX 750 v2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.12
Power efficiencyno data2.32
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM206GK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 November 2015 (9 years ago)22 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122880
Core clock speed1038 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data245 Watt
Texture fill rate38.02210.2
Floating-point processing power1.217 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs32240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2015 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB

GTX 750 v2 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Tesla K40m, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 v2 and Tesla K40m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 v2 is a desktop card while Tesla K40m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2
NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Tesla K40m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 49 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 20 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.