ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4481532
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.78no data
Power efficiency11.63no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM107RV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)19 February 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1020 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate43.400.55
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs403

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s183 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 Ti 3900
+194900%
ATI 7000 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data
World of Tanks 140−150 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data
World of Tanks 70−75 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 20−22 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Fortnite 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 no data
Valorant 10−11 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 February 2014 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 750 Ti has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 160.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 6723 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 195 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.