Quadro K1200 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 750 Ti with Quadro K1200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.11
+32.7%

GTX 750 Ti outperforms K1200 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441521
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.782.50
Power efficiency12.0412.10
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM107GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)28 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $321.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 750 Ti has 91% better value for money than Quadro K1200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed1020 MHz1058 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate43.4035.97
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm160 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sUp to 80 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.11
+32.7%
Quadro K1200 7.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 Ti 3901
+32.7%
Quadro K1200 2940

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 750 Ti 11517
+30.6%
Quadro K1200 8821

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 750 Ti 10065
+31.1%
Quadro K1200 7677

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 750 Ti 12499
+37.8%
Quadro K1200 9073

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 750 Ti 35
+34.6%
Quadro K1200 26

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
+40%
35−40
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Hitman 3 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and Quadro K1200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 40% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.11 7.62
Recency 18 February 2014 28 January 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 45 Watt

GTX 750 Ti has a 32.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro K1200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro K1200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 6395 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 97 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.