GeForce GT 630M vs GTX 750 Ti

Place in the ranking	445	1002
Place by popularity	31	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.78	no data
Power efficiency	11.74	2.94
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GM107	GF108
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	96
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	Up to 800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	10.56
Floating-point processing power	1.389 TFLOPS	0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	40	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	145 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	Up to 128bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	Up to 32.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	-	+
Blu Ray 3D	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
3D Vision	+	-
Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Live	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2	no data	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.11
+627%

GT 630M 1.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 Ti 3901
+625%

GT 630M 538

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 750 Ti 5378
+420%

GT 630M 1035

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 750 Ti 21608
+344%

GT 630M 4869

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 750 Ti 4294
+497%

GT 630M 719

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 750 Ti 31349
+462%

GT 630M 5577

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 750 Ti 11522
+380%

GT 630M 2399

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 750 Ti 54
+443%

GT 630M 10

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 750 Ti 35
+400%

GT 630M 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	130−140 +584%	19 −584%
Full HD	52 +225%	16 −225%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

2.87

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18
+300%

4−5

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +2133%	3−4 −2133%
Hitman 3	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +267%	14−16 −267%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +313%	8−9 −313%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +90.9%	30−35 −90.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +2133%	3−4 −2133%
Hitman 3	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +267%	14−16 −267%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +313%	8−9 −313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +80%	15 −80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +90.9%	30−35 −90.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +2133%	3−4 −2133%
Hitman 3	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +267%	14−16 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +313%	8−9 −313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +90.9%	30−35 −90.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+1300%

2−3

−1300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +650%	6−7 −650%
Hitman 3	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +814%	7−8 −814%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+325%

4−5

−325%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Hitman 3	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +633%	6−7 −633%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+233%

3−4

−233%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and GT 630M compete in popular games:

GTX 750 Ti is 584% faster in 900p
GTX 750 Ti is 225% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 2133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 750 Ti surpassed GT 630M in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.11	1.39
Recency	18 February 2014	22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	33 Watt

GTX 750 Ti has a 627.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 630M, on the other hand, has 81.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GT 630M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.