GeForce GT 330M vs GTX 680

Place in the ranking	355	1207
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.95	no data
Power efficiency	5.12	1.69
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	GK104	GT216
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	48
Core clock speed	1006 MHz	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	1058 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,540 million	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	195 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	135.4	10.00
Floating-point processing power	3.25 TFLOPS	0.06528 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	182
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	128	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	254 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2048 MB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256-bit GDDR5	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	25.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor support	4 displays	+
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

no data

8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.2	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680 14.42
+2475%

GT 330M 0.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680 5565
+2476%

GT 330M 216

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 680 29702
+1018%

GT 330M 2658

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	45 +350%	10 −350%
Full HD	73 +329%	17 −329%
4K	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.84	no data
4K	19.19	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+633%

3−4

−633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +725%	4−5 −725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Battlefield 5	45−50 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Hitman 3	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +573%	10−12 −573%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +683%	6−7 −683%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +153%	30−33 −153%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +725%	4−5 −725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Battlefield 5	45−50 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Hitman 3	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +573%	10−12 −573%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +4800%	1−2 −4800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +683%	6−7 −683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	94 +840%	10−11 −840%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +153%	30−33 −153%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +725%	4−5 −725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Hitman 3	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +573%	10−12 −573%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +683%	6−7 −683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +120%	10−11 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +153%	30−33 −153%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+3900%

1−2

−3900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +3600%	2−3 −3600%
Hitman 3	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
Metro Exodus	24−27	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +8800%	1−2 −8800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+700%

3−4

−700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12	0−1
Hitman 3	10−11	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +3450%	2−3 −3450%
Metro Exodus	14−16	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	18−20	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+550%

2−3

−550%

This is how GTX 680 and GT 330M compete in popular games:

GTX 680 is 350% faster in 900p
GTX 680 is 329% faster in 1080p
GTX 680 is 2500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 680 is 8800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 680 surpassed GT 330M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.42	0.56
Recency	22 March 2012	10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	2048 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	195 Watt	23 Watt

GTX 680 has a 2475% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 330M, on the other hand, has 747.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 680 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 330M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.