Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce GTX 675MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675MX with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.04

PRO W7700 outperforms GTX 675MX by a whopping 617% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking55057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.21
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameN13E-GSRNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2012 (11 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9603072
CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate52.32499.2
Floating-point processing power1.256 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675MX 7.04
PRO W7700 50.50
+617%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675MX 2716
PRO W7700 19480
+617%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
−560%
350−400
+560%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−567%
300−310
+567%
Hitman 3 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−607%
290−300
+607%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−567%
300−310
+567%
Hitman 3 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−607%
290−300
+607%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−606%
120−130
+606%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−567%
300−310
+567%
Hitman 3 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−607%
290−300
+607%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Hitman 3 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−582%
300−310
+582%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Hitman 3 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−614%
150−160
+614%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%

This is how GTX 675MX and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 560% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.04 50.50
Recency 1 October 2012 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 190 Watt

GTX 675MX has 90% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 617.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675MX is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 40 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.