RTX A500 vs GeForce GTX 675M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.99

RTX A500 outperforms GTX 675M by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking624305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.6021.12
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF114GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)10 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed620 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate39.68113.3
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M 4.99
RTX A500 17.56
+252%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1927
RTX A500 6775
+252%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
−233%
160−170
+233%
Full HD46
−248%
160−170
+248%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−248%
160−170
+248%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−248%
160−170
+248%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−248%
160−170
+248%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Hitman 3 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hitman 3 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

This is how GTX 675M and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 is 233% faster in 900p
  • RTX A500 is 248% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.99 17.56
Recency 22 March 2012 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A500 has a 251.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 135 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.