RTX A400 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Place in the ranking	486	416
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.04	15.58
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N12E-GTX2	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)	16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	620 MHz	727 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1762 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2x 100 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	42.29
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	24
Tensor Cores	no data	24
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	163 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−14.3%

16−18
+14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −20%	60−65 +20%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −20%	60−65 +20%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −20%	60−65 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−25%

30−33
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Hitman 3	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −25%	70−75 +25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−20%

18−20
+20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−11.1%

10−11

+11.1%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.79	11.27
Recency	6 January 2011	16 April 2024
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has 2400% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.