GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GTX 670MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking627not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameN13E-GRNV38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (11 years ago)23 October 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960no data
CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed600 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt74 Watt
Texture fill rate48.083.800
Floating-point performance1.154 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz950 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s30.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670MX 1951
+3207%
FX 5950 Ultra 59

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2012 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 74 Watt

GTX 670MX has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5950 Ultra, on the other hand, has 1.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 670MX and GeForce FX 5950 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX is a notebook card while GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 49 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 38 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.