GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs GTX 670M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670M and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670M
2012
1536 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.54
+34.3%

GTX 670M outperforms GTX 775M Mac Edition by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking668745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.152.32
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF114GK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3361344
Core clock speed598 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4989.26
Floating-point processing power0.8037 TFLOPS2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs56112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width192bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Full HD41
+36.7%
30−35
−36.7%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Fortnite 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Atomic Heart 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 91
+40%
65−70
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Dota 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Fortnite 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Dota 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Valorant 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Fortnite 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GTX 670M and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670M is 44% faster in 900p
  • GTX 670M is 37% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.54 3.38
Recency 22 March 2012 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 670M has a 34.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 670M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
92 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670M or GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.