GeForce 9100M G vs GTX 660M

Place in the ranking	710	1408
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.22	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	no data
GPU code name	GK107	MCP77MH MCP79MH
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	8
Core clock speed	835 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,270 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	30.40	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	10
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660M 3.79
+2006%

9100M G 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660M 1457
+2043%

9100M G 68

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	32 +3100%	1−2 −3100%
Full HD	35 +3400%	1−2 −3400%
1200p	38 +3700%	1−2 −3700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Elden Ring	8−9	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Metro Exodus	8−9	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Valorant	5−6	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Dota 2	10−12	0−1
Elden Ring	8−9	0−1
Far Cry 5	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Fortnite	21−24 +2100%	1−2 −2100%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12	0−1
Metro Exodus	8−9	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +560%	5−6 −560%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Valorant	5−6	0−1
World of Tanks	89 +709%	10−12 −709%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Dota 2	10−12	0−1
Far Cry 5	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +560%	5−6 −560%
Valorant	5−6	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3	0−1
Elden Ring	4−5	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
World of Tanks	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Valorant	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Elden Ring	2−3	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	4−5	0−1
Fortnite	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Valorant	3−4	0−1