RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 660

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434not rated
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.27no data
Power efficiency5.14no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK106AD106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 September 2012 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9604608
Core clock speed980 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate82.56244.1
Floating-point processing power1.981 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs80144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 September 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 21.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660 and RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 4240 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.