GeForce RTX 5070 vs GTX 660
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 436 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 81 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.44 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.15 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GK106 | GB205 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 September 2012 (12 years ago) | February 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 960 | 6144 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 2165 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 2510 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,540 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 82.56 | 481.9 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.981 TFLOPS | 30.84 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 2209 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | 672.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| 3D Vision | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | 10.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
GTX 660 has 78.6% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce RTX 5070. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
