FirePro M8900 vs GeForce GTX 660
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 433 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 89 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.28 | no data |
Power efficiency | 5.35 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | GK106 | Blackcomb |
Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 6 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 12 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 960 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 680 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 75 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 82.56 | 32.64 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.981 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 24 | 32 |
TMUs | 80 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | n/a |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Form factor | no data | MXM-B |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | 115 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
HDCP | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
3D Gaming | + | - |
3D Vision | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 6 September 2012 | 12 April 2011 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 75 Watt |
GTX 660 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
FirePro M8900, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660 and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 is a desktop card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.