GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs GTX 660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 560 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.47
+44.5%

GTX 660 Ti outperforms GTX 560 Ti by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking419519
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.191.83
Power efficiency5.243.20
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK104GF114
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 August 2012 (12 years ago)25 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 660 Ti has 74% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344384
Core clock speed915 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate109.852.67
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS1.263 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs11264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s128.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.47
+44.5%
GTX 560 Ti 7.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 Ti 4417
+44.4%
GTX 560 Ti 3058

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 660 Ti 8415
+110%
GTX 560 Ti 4013

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 660 Ti 23726
+53.1%
GTX 560 Ti 15494

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 660 Ti 5432
+56.5%
GTX 560 Ti 3470

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15315
+42.8%
GTX 560 Ti 10727

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 660 Ti 43
+13.2%
GTX 560 Ti 38

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

GTX 660 Ti 774
+39.5%
GTX 560 Ti 555

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p90−95
+42.9%
63
−42.9%
Full HD75
+13.6%
66
−13.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.993.77

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+46.2%
50−55
−46.2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+21.4%
55−60
−21.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+46.2%
50−55
−46.2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+21.4%
55−60
−21.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+46.2%
50−55
−46.2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+21.4%
55−60
−21.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Hitman 3 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and GTX 560 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 43% faster in 900p
  • GTX 660 Ti is 14% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 660 Ti is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.47 7.94
Recency 16 August 2012 25 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 170 Watt

GTX 660 Ti has a 44.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 817 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 826 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.