Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking734not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.79no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 August 2012 (12 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11523456
Core clock speed823 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate85.25432.0
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs96216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 August 2012 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 158 Watt

GTX 660 OEM has 21.5% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660 OEM and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 34 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.