UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M SLI with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580M SLI
2011
100 Watt
10.17
+64.8%

GTX 580M SLI outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking445584
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Power efficiency6.9928.28
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768256
Core clock speed620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580M SLI 10.17
+64.8%
UHD Graphics 770 6.17

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 580M SLI 6106
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+169%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 580M SLI 25022
+842%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p76
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Full HD91
+379%
19
−379%
1200p81
+80%
45−50
−80%
4K21−24
+50%
14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+66.7%
12
−66.7%
Elden Ring 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+300%
5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+78.3%
23
−78.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Valorant 35−40
+144%
16
−144%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+200%
6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Dota 2 35−40
+85%
20
−85%
Elden Ring 30−33
+173%
11
−173%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+40%
30
−40%
Fortnite 55−60
+63.9%
35−40
−63.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+128%
18
−128%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+300%
9
−300%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+52.9%
50−55
−52.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+63.2%
18−20
−63.2%
Valorant 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
World of Tanks 140−150
+50.5%
95−100
−50.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+260%
5
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Dota 2 35−40
−8.1%
40
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+44.8%
27−30
−44.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+156%
16
−156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+52.9%
50−55
−52.9%
Valorant 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Elden Ring 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+29.7%
35−40
−29.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
World of Tanks 70−75
+62.2%
45−50
−62.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+69.2%
12−14
−69.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Valorant 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Elden Ring 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20−22
+42.9%
14
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Fortnite 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Valorant 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

This is how GTX 580M SLI and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 580M SLI is 69% faster in 900p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 379% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 80% faster in 1200p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 580M SLI is 300% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 580M SLI is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.17 6.17
Recency 6 January 2011 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 580M SLI has a 64.8% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580M SLI is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M SLI
GeForce GTX 580M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1283 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.