GeForce GT 610 vs GTX 570 Rev. 2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and GeForce GT 610, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 570 Rev. 2 outperforms GT 610 by a whopping 785% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 546 | 1147 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 85 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.98 | 0.01 |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | GF110 | GF119 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 2 April 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $39.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 570 Rev. 2 has 9700% better value for money than GT 610.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 48 |
CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 810 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 292 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 29 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 102 °C |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 6.480 |
Floating-point performance | 1.405 gflops | 0.1555 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | no data | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 145 mm |
Height | no data | 2.7" (6.9 cm) |
Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 1024 MB |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | - | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 7.08 | 0.80 |
Recency | 7 December 2010 | 2 April 2012 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 1024 MB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | 29 Watt |
GTX 570 Rev. 2 has a 785% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GT 610, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 655.2% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 610 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.