ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP vs GeForce GTX 560M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 741 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.02 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | R400 (2004−2008) |
| GPU code name | GF116 | R420 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 May 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 160 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 48 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.80 | 5.700 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5952 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 24 | 12 |
| TMUs | 32 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
| SLI options | 2-way | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | Up to 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 60 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 9.0b (9_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 May 2011 | 1 May 2004 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 48 Watt |
GTX 560M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.
ATI X800 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 56.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon X800 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M is a notebook card while Radeon X800 PRO AGP is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
