Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI with Quadro 2000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560M SLI
2011
100 Watt
6.48
+221%

GTX 560M SLI outperforms 2000M by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.28
Power efficiency4.482.54
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN12E-GSGF106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)13 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$46.56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed775 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data17.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560M SLI 6.48
+221%
Quadro 2000M 2.02

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 560M SLI 3616
+187%
Quadro 2000M 1261

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 560M SLI 17484
+164%
Quadro 2000M 6634

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+216%
38
−216%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

This is how GTX 560M SLI and Quadro 2000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560M SLI is 216% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 560M SLI is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 560M SLI surpassed Quadro 2000M in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.48 2.02
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 560M SLI has a 220.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro 2000M, on the other hand, has 81.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 92 votes

Rate Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.