GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GTX 560M SLI

Place in the ranking	575	35
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	81.93
Power efficiency	4.50	25.52
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N12E-GS	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 January 2011 (14 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	4352
Core clock speed	775 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	344.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Elden Ring	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −785%	230−240 +785%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Valorant	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Dota 2	21−24 −764%	190−200 +764%
Elden Ring	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −800%	270−280 +800%
Fortnite	35−40 −797%	350−400 +797%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −785%	230−240 +785%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −764%	190−200 +764%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −733%	450−500 +733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%
Valorant	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%
World of Tanks	100−110 −782%	900−950 +782%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Dota 2	21−24 −764%	190−200 +764%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −800%	270−280 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −785%	230−240 +785%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −733%	450−500 +733%
Valorant	20−22 −800%	180−190 +800%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Elden Ring	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −689%	300−310 +689%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
World of Tanks	45−50 −751%	400−450 +751%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −764%	95−100 +764%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Valorant	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 −789%	160−170 +789%
Elden Ring	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Dota 2	18−20 −789%	160−170 +789%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Fortnite	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Valorant	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.54	59.31
Recency	6 January 2011	18 May 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	160 Watt

GTX 560M SLI has 60% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 806.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.