ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 560 Ti
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
7.94
+2638%

GTX 560 Ti outperforms ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP by a whopping 2638% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5191340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.83no data
Power efficiency3.200.57
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF114RV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384120
Core clock speed823 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate52.674.752
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPS0.1426 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz396 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s12.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.94
+2638%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 0.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3058
+2680%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 110

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Full HD66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.77no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Hitman 3 10−12 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1

This is how GTX 560 Ti and ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 3050% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 Ti is 3200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 0.29
Recency 25 January 2011 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 560 Ti has a 2637.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 385.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 826 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.