HD Graphics 2000 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti with HD Graphics 2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
7.94
+1344%

GTX 560 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5191216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.84no data
Power efficiency3.20no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameGF114Sandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed823 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate52.678.100
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPS0.1296 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs646

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.94
+1344%
HD Graphics 2000 0.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3058
+1336%
HD Graphics 2000 213

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 560 Ti 15494
+1630%
HD Graphics 2000 896

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63
+1475%
4−5
−1475%
Full HD66
+560%
10
−560%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.77no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Hitman 3 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Hitman 3 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Hitman 3 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+1567%
3−4
−1567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and HD Graphics 2000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 1475% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 Ti is 560% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 560 Ti is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 560 Ti surpassed HD Graphics 2000 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 0.55
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm

GTX 560 Ti has a 1343.6% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 2000, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop card while HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 826 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 1326 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.