ATI FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti with FirePro V5800, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
7.90
+115%

GTX 560 Ti outperforms ATI V5800 by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking514709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.720.36
Power efficiency3.223.43
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF114Juniper
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 560 Ti has 378% better value for money than ATI V5800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed823 MHz690 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt74 Watt
Texture fill rate52.6727.60
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPS1.104 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.90
+115%
ATI V5800 3.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3050
+116%
ATI V5800 1415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63
+133%
27−30
−133%
Full HD60
+122%
27−30
−122%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.1517.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Hitman 3 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Hitman 3 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Hitman 3 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Hitman 3 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and ATI V5800 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 133% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 Ti is 122% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.90 3.67
Recency 25 January 2011 26 April 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 74 Watt

GTX 560 Ti has a 115.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

ATI V5800, on the other hand, has 129.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop card while FirePro V5800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 805 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 97 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.