Matrox Parhelia 256 MB vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking631not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGF114Parhelia-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 February 2012 (12 years ago)25 June 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288no data
Core clock speed736 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.330.8
Floating-point performance0.8479 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length210 mm175 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3828 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth91.87 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DVI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 February 2012 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTX 560 SE has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 SE and Matrox Parhelia 256 MB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Matrox Parhelia 256 MB
Parhelia 256 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 85 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 10 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 256 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.