GeForce RTX 2070 vs GTX 550 Ti

Place in the ranking	697	94
Place by popularity	65	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.78	32.39
Power efficiency	2.40	16.51
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF116	TU106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 March 2011 (13 years ago)	17 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 has 4053% better value for money than GTX 550 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2304
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	116 Watt	175 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	100 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	28.80	233.3
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	7.465 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	64
TMUs	32	144
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	210 mm	229 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4.1 GB/s	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	98.4 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 550 Ti 4.04

RTX 2070 41.97
+939%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 550 Ti 1554

RTX 2070 16134
+938%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 550 Ti 2272

RTX 2070 31260
+1276%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 550 Ti 10229

RTX 2070 63155
+517%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 550 Ti 5782

RTX 2070 88000
+1422%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	38 −821%	350−400 +821%
Full HD	36 −258%	129 +258%
1440p	8−9 −1000%	88 +1000%
4K	5−6 −1140%	62 +1140%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.14 −7%	3.87 +7%
1440p	18.63 −228%	5.67 +228%
4K	29.80 −270%	8.05 +270%

RTX 2070 has 7% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 2070 has 228% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 2070 has 270% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Elden Ring	9−10 −1556%	140−150 +1556%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −718%	90 +718%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −463%	45 +463%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1050%	200−210 +1050%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −1044%	103 +1044%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −746%	110 +746%
Valorant	7−8 −2871%	208 +2871%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −1355%	160 +1355%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −363%	37 +363%
Dota 2	12−14 −983%	130 +983%
Elden Ring	9−10 −1556%	140−150 +1556%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −343%	93 +343%
Fortnite	21−24 −622%	166 +622%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1050%	200−210 +1050%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −958%	127 +958%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −789%	80 +789%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −600%	245 +600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −400%	65 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −979%	150−160 +979%
Valorant	7−8 −1686%	125 +1686%
World of Tanks	65−70 −310%	270−280 +310%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −618%	79 +618%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −709%	85−90 +709%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −300%	32 +300%
Dota 2	12−14 −983%	130 +983%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1050%	200−210 +1050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −277%	132 +277%
Valorant	7−8 −2529%	184 +2529%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −3850%	75−80 +3850%
Elden Ring	4−5 −2100%	85−90 +2100%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −2533%	75−80 +2533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −525%	170−180 +525%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1300%	42 +1300%
World of Tanks	27−30 −814%	260−270 +814%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1420%	76 +1420%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −378%	40−45 +378%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1400%	130−140 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2975%	120−130 +2975%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −8100%	82 +8100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Valorant	12−14 −958%	127 +958%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −438%	86 +438%
Elden Ring	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −438%	86 +438%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1064%	128 +1064%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −438%	86 +438%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1500%	48 +1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Dota 2	16−18 −625%	116 +625%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1500%	60−65 +1500%
Fortnite	3−4 −1933%	60−65 +1933%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Valorant	4−5 −1600%	68 +1600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

40−45

+0%

40−45

+0%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and RTX 2070 compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 is 821% faster in 900p
RTX 2070 is 258% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 is 1000% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 is 1140% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 is 8100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2070 is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.04	41.97
Recency	15 March 2011	17 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	116 Watt	175 Watt

GTX 550 Ti has 50.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070, on the other hand, has a 938.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 550 Ti in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.