ATI Graphics Ultra + vs GeForce GTX 485M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.27no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF104Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 1992 (32 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1150 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate36.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 800 nm

GTX 485M has an age advantage of 19 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 485M and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M is a notebook card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.