Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce GTX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon RX 6800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 480
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 250 Watt
10.70

RX 6800 XT outperforms GTX 480 by a whopping 508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.6449.92
Power efficiency2.9514.92
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 March 2010 (14 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6800 XT has 2944% better value for money than GTX 480.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4804608
Core clock speed700 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate42.06648.0
Floating-point processing power1.345 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs60288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1848 MHz (3696 data rate)2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 480 10.70
RX 6800 XT 65.04
+508%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 480 4113
RX 6800 XT 25003
+508%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 480 5014
RX 6800 XT 52046
+938%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 480 3650
RX 6800 XT 49735
+1263%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−577%
203
+577%
1440p21−24
−590%
145
+590%
4K16−18
−525%
100
+525%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.63
−420%
3.20
+420%
1440p23.76
−431%
4.48
+431%
4K31.19
−381%
6.49
+381%
  • RX 6800 XT has 420% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 431% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 381% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−660%
150−160
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−610%
140−150
+610%
Elden Ring 30−35
−700%
240−250
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−234%
110−120
+234%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−660%
150−160
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−610%
140−150
+610%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−840%
404
+840%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−338%
127
+338%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−336%
122
+336%
Valorant 40−45
−878%
401
+878%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−234%
110−120
+234%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−660%
150−160
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−610%
140−150
+610%
Dota 2 35−40
−308%
155
+308%
Elden Ring 30−35
−700%
240−250
+700%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−34.9%
58
+34.9%
Fortnite 60−65
−310%
250−260
+310%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−726%
355
+726%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−295%
150
+295%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−314%
120
+314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−162%
210−220
+162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−361%
129
+361%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−444%
170−180
+444%
Valorant 40−45
−322%
173
+322%
World of Tanks 150−160
−83.6%
270−280
+83.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−234%
110−120
+234%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−660%
150−160
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−610%
140−150
+610%
Dota 2 35−40
−282%
145
+282%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−191%
120−130
+191%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−602%
302
+602%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−162%
210−220
+162%
Valorant 40−45
−768%
356
+768%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−757%
120
+757%
Elden Ring 14−16
−1000%
160−170
+1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−757%
120
+757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−250%
170−180
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−822%
83
+822%
World of Tanks 75−80
−474%
400−450
+474%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−314%
85−90
+314%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−950%
80−85
+950%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−567%
160−170
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−825%
222
+825%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−433%
112
+433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Valorant 24−27
−969%
278
+969%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Dota 2 21−24
−538%
134
+538%
Elden Ring 7−8
−1143%
85−90
+1143%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−538%
134
+538%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−833%
56
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−574%
200−210
+574%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−657%
53
+657%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−538%
134
+538%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−833%
80−85
+833%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Dota 2 21−24
−481%
122
+481%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−708%
100−110
+708%
Fortnite 10−12
−773%
95−100
+773%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−850%
133
+850%
Valorant 10−12
−1291%
153
+1291%

This is how GTX 480 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 577% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 590% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 525% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 1480% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6800 XT surpassed GTX 480 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.70 65.04
Recency 26 March 2010 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 480 has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 507.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 480 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 480
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 221 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3643 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.