GeForce 8200 vs GTX 470M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking624not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.67no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF104C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28816
Core clock speed535 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate25.684.000
Floating-point processing power0.6163 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470M 1953
+1160%
GeForce 8200 155

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 470M has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 8200, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 470M and GeForce 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470M is a notebook card while GeForce 8200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
GeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIA GeForce 8200
GeForce 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 61 vote

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.