Radeon R9 M485X vs GeForce GTX 470M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 470M SLI and Radeon R9 M485X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 470M SLI
2010
6.63

R9 M485X outperforms GTX 470M SLI by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking562464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.65
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameN11E-GTAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2010 (14 years ago)15 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5762048
Core clock speed535 MHz723 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.54
Floating-point processing powerno data2.961 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p66
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Full HD77
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−35.3%
21−24
+35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−43.2%
60−65
+43.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−32.5%
50−55
+32.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−17.3%
60−65
+17.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−35.3%
21−24
+35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−43.2%
60−65
+43.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−32.5%
50−55
+32.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−17.3%
60−65
+17.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−35.3%
21−24
+35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−43.2%
60−65
+43.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−32.5%
50−55
+32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−17.3%
60−65
+17.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−86.4%
40−45
+86.4%
Hitman 3 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hitman 3 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−105%
35−40
+105%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

This is how GTX 470M SLI and R9 M485X compete in popular games:

  • R9 M485X is 36% faster in 900p
  • R9 M485X is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M485X is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M485X surpassed GTX 470M SLI in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.63 9.49
Recency 1 November 2010 15 May 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R9 M485X has a 43.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M485X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.