Radeon RX 6600 XT vs GeForce GTX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 470 and Radeon RX 6600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 470
2010
1280 MB GDDR5, 225 Watt
8.05

RX 6600 XT outperforms GTX 470 by a whopping 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking51290
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2965.18
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 April 2010 (14 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 4953% better value for money than GTX 470.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482048
CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed607 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt160 (TGP) Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.05331.4
Floating-point performance1.089 gflops10.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mm190 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1674 MHz (3348 data rate)16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth133.9 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 470 8.05
RX 6600 XT 42.80
+432%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 470 3106
RX 6600 XT 16512
+432%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 470 16753
RX 6600 XT 88163
+426%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 470 4342
RX 6600 XT 39051
+799%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 470 2758
RX 6600 XT 28342
+928%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 470 25757
RX 6600 XT 156297
+507%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p43
−412%
220−230
+412%
Full HD68
−89.7%
129
+89.7%
1200p53
−428%
280−290
+428%
1440p12−14
−483%
70
+483%
4K7−8
−486%
41
+486%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−508%
79
+508%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−1073%
129
+1073%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−471%
130−140
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−438%
85−90
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−500%
78
+500%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−406%
90−95
+406%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−357%
100−110
+357%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−269%
190−200
+269%
Hitman 3 16−18
−575%
108
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−278%
170−180
+278%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−454%
130−140
+454%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−341%
95−100
+341%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−489%
150−160
+489%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−133%
130−140
+133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−864%
106
+864%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−471%
130−140
+471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−438%
85−90
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−485%
76
+485%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−406%
90−95
+406%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−357%
100−110
+357%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−269%
190−200
+269%
Hitman 3 16−18
−575%
108
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−278%
170−180
+278%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−454%
130−140
+454%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−341%
95−100
+341%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−674%
209
+674%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−283%
85−90
+283%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−133%
130−140
+133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
−582%
75
+582%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−438%
85−90
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−431%
69
+431%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−406%
90−95
+406%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−269%
190−200
+269%
Hitman 3 16−18
−525%
100
+525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−241%
157
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−578%
183
+578%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−330%
99
+330%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−7%
61
+7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−341%
95−100
+341%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−419%
80−85
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1300%
56
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40
+900%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−444%
45−50
+444%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−658%
230−240
+658%
Hitman 3 10−12
−509%
67
+509%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−582%
116
+582%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−880%
98
+880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1586%
118
+1586%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−814%
60−65
+814%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−296%
200−210
+296%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−429%
70−75
+429%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Hitman 3 4−5
−725%
33
+725%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−559%
190−200
+559%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−980%
54
+980%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−833%
28
+833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−700%
24
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%

This is how GTX 470 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 412% faster in 900p
  • RX 6600 XT is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 428% faster in 1200p
  • RX 6600 XT is 483% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 486% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 1933% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed GTX 470 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.05 42.80
Recency 12 April 2010 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 160 Watt

RX 6600 XT has a 431.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 470 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 470
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 311 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 4007 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.