ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 465

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 460 GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 SE GTX 460 v2 GTX 465 GTX 470 GTX 480 GTX 490 GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti GTX 960
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Mobility Radeon HD 5145 Mobility Radeon HD 5430 Mobility Radeon HD 5450 Mobility Radeon HD 5470 Mobility Radeon HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5750 Mobility Radeon HD 5830 Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 with Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire, including specs and performance data.

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.87
+43.1%
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire
2010
2x1 GB DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5, 120 Watt
4.80

GTX 465 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 465 GTX 465
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking555637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.15no data
Power efficiency2.382.77
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF100Broadway-XT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3521600
Core clock speed607 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.75no data
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPSno data
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2x1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p75−80
+41.5%
53
−41.5%
Full HD75−80
+38.9%
54
−38.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 465 and ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • GTX 465 is 42% faster in 900p
  • GTX 465 is 39% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 68 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.87 4.80
Recency 31 May 2010 7 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 465 has a 43.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 465 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 465 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
vs
GeForce 945A GeForce 945A
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
Pro 455 Radeon Pro 455
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
HD 7450M Radeon HD 7450M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GeForce 710M GeForce 710M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GT 540M GeForce GT 540M
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
9650M GS GeForce 9650M GS
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
9500M GS GeForce 9500M GS
GTX 465 GeForce GTX 465
vs
GeForce 310M GeForce 310M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 100 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.