GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GTX 465

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 465
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
6.88
+4.9%

GTX 465 outperforms GTX 650 Ti by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.232.09
Power efficiency2.364.09
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF100GK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)9 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 650 Ti has 70% better value for money than GTX 465.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352768
Core clock speed607 MHz928 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt110 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °C105 °C
Texture fill rate26.7559.39
Floating-point processing power0.8554 TFLOPS1.425 TFLOPS
Compute performance30xno data
ROPs3216
TMUs4464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm145 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1603 MHz (3206 data rate)5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth102.6 GB/s86.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMIOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI
Multi monitor support+4 Displays
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.3
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 465 6.88
+4.9%
GTX 650 Ti 6.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 465 2650
+4.9%
GTX 650 Ti 2527

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 465 9276
+16.3%
GTX 650 Ti 7979

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.88 6.56
Recency 31 May 2010 9 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 110 Watt

GTX 465 has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 650 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 81.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 465 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 100 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1837 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.